THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN THE GLOBAL WORLD

THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION IN THE GLOBAL WORLD
Kalimbetova Dinara,
Grasp scholar,
Osh State College
Summary.
The brand new state of affairs is that for the primary time within the worldwide neighborhood its angle in direction of itself turns into an important and decisive, since it’s at this start line that the foundations and prospects for world improvement are being laid right now. At this time, this self-determination of humanity is considerably distorted by its systemic and technological “filling”, the predominance of which supplies rise to social alienation and standardization of the mass consciousness of individuals, the dominance of such regulatory devices as mass tradition, the market setting, and so on., and the expansion of worldwide data and communication networks.
Key phrases: globalization, informational and cultural local weather, data and communication work, sociocultural communications, worldwide neighborhood.
Introduction
In right now’s interconnected world, the power to speak throughout cultural boundaries is extra essential than ever. It facilitates communication throughout linguistic and cultural boundaries, resulting in extra tolerance, acceptance, and, in the end, stronger relationships amongst folks of numerous backgrounds.
The brand new state of affairs is that for the primary time within the worldwide neighborhood its angle in direction of itself turns into an important and decisive, since it’s at this start line that the foundations and prospects for world improvement are being laid right now. At this time, this self-determination of humanity is considerably distorted by its systemic and technological “filling”, the predominance of which supplies rise to social alienation and standardization of the mass consciousness of individuals, the dominance of such regulatory devices as mass tradition, the market setting, and so on., and the expansion of worldwide data and communication networks. Nevertheless, the personal motion of native worlds is changing into an increasing number of noticeable, giving rise to programs of intercultural interplay and partnerships.
Thus, the angle of humanity in direction of itself right now happens at a systemic stage, targeted on sustainability and inner harmonization (that’s, these traits are set by the properties of the social system itself), and at a extra explicit stage – private and group ranges, together with social communities – a state of fixed competitors, along with revolutionary modifications, creates conditions and a normal context sustaining uncertainty and chaos. It’s when it comes to a optimistic decision of this contradiction that essential duties turn out to be the identification and help of exactly these actions and native initiatives that “work for the system”, increasing the orderly and coordinated socio-cultural area of partnership and dialogue between international locations and peoples. And among the many numerous native processes, which for his or her particular functions act as conductors of system-wide objectives and necessities for reaching the unity of the world neighborhood, intercultural communications could be distinguished.
Supplies and strategies
In the course of the investigation the strategies of analysis and evaluation as comparative evaluation, systemic and structural-functional evaluation have been used within the article.
At this time, intercultural communications are studied to a larger extent on the particular empirical stage: the event of worldwide cultural tourism and its types, packages for the settlement of refugees and migrants, the examine of the traits of psychology, symbolism and mentality of representatives of various cultures, intercultural entrepreneurial exercise and enterprise, state intercultural coverage and and so on. The widespread motive for that is the underdevelopment of the very idea of intercultural communications, which requires the event of a contemporary data and communication image of the world as a particular cultural and semantic “projection” of the globalization course of.
Nevertheless, analysis into the traits of social and sociocultural communications within the path of their conceptualization are very lively right now. We’re realizing that these communications categorical the systemically organized area of globalization at no matter explicit stage they happen. Subsequently, the event of the idea of sociocultural communications ought to be aimed not solely at clarifying their very own traits, but additionally at setting tips that might make sure the decision of contemporary inner contradictions of the knowledge society within the path of humanism and strengthening the position of tradition. However for this, the sociocultural system itself should develop its position in regulating the path of the dynamics of all the society. One can help the place of O.D. Shipunova, who notes that “the communicative method permits us to see within the idea of social order an ambiguous relationship between the sacred, social and existential. The strategic line of this relationship is the interpretation of which means” [1, p. 7]. However since which means is an important content material of sociocultural communications, their peculiarity is that the premise right here is “subject-subject interplay, mediated by data that is smart for each topics” [2, p. 53].
The concept of ​​an inter-subjective foundation for dialogue is being actively analyzed nonetheless in Soviet philosophy. Thus, A. M. Korshunov and V. V. Mantatov, emphasize that in dialogue “the item of analysis itself has a subjective dimension,” that’s, “the topic is aware of the topic”.
And to be able to know one other topic, “one should enter right into a dialogical relationship with him.” Solely within the technique of dialogue between personalities and consciousnesses is it doable to grasp the subjective world: “one subjective world reveals its semantic depths by assembly and coming into contact with one other world” [3, p. 166].
It’s exactly the which means of such communications, their concentrate on solidarity and cooperation, overlaying a wider area, acquired a optimistic evaluation comparatively way back, specifically, within the concepts of progressive Russian and European thinkers. Thus, Russian thinkers interpreted solidarity as mutual help (P. L. Lavrov), mutual help (P. A. Kropotkin), cooperation (N. Okay. Mikhailovsky, L. I. Mechnikov). Western ideologists of social partnership additionally relied on concepts about love and brotherhood, proposing the institution of a relationship of equality between all lessons in society via the introduction of widespread legislation, group of labor, distribution of wealth (L. Blanc), affiliation in artless (P. Proudhon), and the institution of productive associations (F. Lassalle).
Outcomes and dialogue
Social and sociocultural communications have a humanistic orientation on the stage of being (and never simply any particular duties), specializing in social solidarity and social partnership. This reveals their essential operate – in increasing the size and stage of the area of settlement, solidarity, which is carried out on the premise of dialogue – a type of communication throughout which interacting topics come to a fact of a better order, altering their preliminary positions, and exactly as a result of new concepts guarantee unity and interconnection of dialogue members and turn out to be the premise for sustainable social partnership. It’s the ontological foundation of the dialogue that turns into the premise for increasing its communicative and semantic area, forming mutual understanding and associate positions of the events. Realized as an expression of the pursuits and issues of the members within the dialogue, in an goal context all this acts as a manifestation of the systemic regulation of inter-subjective communications geared toward coordination within the context of recognized widespread objectives. Because the tendency of any system is to arrange its content material and enhance the extent of stability of its personal existence, then an essential path right here is the particular “synchronization of positions” of topics of social and cultural (in addition to different) communications.
All the above is sufficient to analyze the inner which means, path and features of intercultural communications, their position within the fashionable world neighborhood.
To start with, the topics of such communications are conspecific cultures of sure peoples. At this time, the idea of “tradition” is likely one of the most capacious and inexhaustible; it has a whole lot of approaches and definitions. We are able to proceed from the truth that tradition is a particular lifestyle of a selected folks or neighborhood, a method of organizing its non secular and semantic unity and a particular worth, linguistic area wherein this unity is realized. Tradition is, along with society, an important path of private identification, which is achieved within the technique of socialization of people. Cultures are enormous non secular and symbolic worlds that give delivery to their very own meanings, worldview programs, non secular and symbolic tips for folks’s lives. Subsequently, intercultural communication is a posh technique of crossing totally different integral worlds, wherein the method of mutual recognition, understanding and recognition of their bearers (the inhabitants of those worlds as representatives of particular cultures) takes place. At this time, the philosophical literature has established the place that the purpose of intercultural communications understands, figuring out which means, and the type of implementation of this course of is dialogue. Thus, V. S. Bibler notes: “The 20 th century revealed the necessity for communication (and never the Hegelian “sublation”) of distinctive cultures, irreducible to one another, however dialogically dealing with one another, every of which is common and infinitely wealthy in potential meanings ( historic, medieval, fashionable, fashionable tradition, cultures of the West and East). Logic of considering is required as logic of communication between such historic cultures, and doable cultures that haven’t but been realized” [4, p.37]. To know one other tradition isn’t just to make it the topic and content material of 1’s information, says Bibler, however “it means… to deal with it as one thing fully totally different from “I,” than my considering, my cultural being.”
The extra I perceive one other tradition (the tragedy of Aeschylus, Shakespeare’s “Hamlet”, Rembrandt’s “Prodigal Son,” Kant’s “Critique of Pure Purpose”), all of the extra so I establish what is meaningless to me, however needed for my being, “my non secular certainty.”
This paradox additionally exists in private communication: understanding exists so long as there may be misunderstanding, that’s, “the understanding that that is one other particular person, one other non secular universe, past my existence” [4, p. 38].
Right here, some ontological options of the dialogue of cultures are revealed: understanding within the context of “misunderstanding” is exactly a particular commensurate of consciousness and being. My understanding of different cultures is exactly doable in opposition to the background of the truth that their very own existence is way more advanced and multidimensional than the framework of my notion of the latter. Nevertheless, the fashionable data society additionally imposes its personal limitation on the peculiarities of notion and understanding of different cultures: right here a sure “instrumental” method begins to emerge, wherein precedence is given to not the non secular precept, however to some systemic “cuts” and influences. Thus, L.A. Ornatskaya, contemplating concepts concerning the dialogue of cultures in home analysis, notes: “In home literature, the time period “dialogue of cultures” is most frequently used as a metaphor to indicate the affect of 1 tradition on one other. The concept of ​​“reciprocity” could be very hardly ever confirmed. In the meantime, the dialogue of cultures presupposes the presence of two topics, two poles of interplay. On the identical time, the emphasis is on borrowing: there may be dialogue the place there are borrowings. However since not all interactions between cultures could be declared a dialogue (a lot of them are “monologue” in nature and related to numerous kinds of violence), within the observe of particular analysis, cultural dialogism is related to these borrowings which might be made voluntarily. However the voluntariness of borrowing can not at all times be established. Allow us to bear in mind the complaints of A.I. Herzen about how potatoes have been planted in France and Russia. In Russia – by power, and in France – by crafty (“with the thoughts”), however is it voluntary? Borrowing mechanisms reminiscent of imitation, seduction, complexes a few stronger tradition are tough to unambiguously consider based mostly on the criterion of voluntariness, not solely as a result of they can be utilized for manipulative functions, but additionally as a result of they presuppose a minimal of this very will.
Nevertheless, this isn’t the principle factor. When the issue of dialogue of cultures is recognized with the issue of mutual influences and cultural contacts, it loses its “existential” content material. The principle query isn’t whether or not one tradition borrowed one thing from one other and, in flip, shared one thing with it, however whether or not these contacts and borrowings contributed to the institution of its originality, and, in precept, survival. In dialogue, tradition defends its proper to existence, independence and specialness. Selective, fragmentary info of borrowings in themselves don’t point out something apart from a press release of those borrowings” [5, p. 53–54]. What the authors imply right here is that individual manifestations of intercultural communications could be understood from a extra normal place of integrity.
The civil tradition of a person within the context of a tradition of consent with out its cultural-dialogical “minimize” seems to be incomplete impure, since with out this the civil tradition of the person is disadvantaged of its important value-humanistic dimension. Near this place is the interpretation of the tradition of consent by M. P. Menyaeva, who in her dissertation notes that “relations of consent, based mostly on the values ​​of non-violence, justice, mercy, tolerance, and so on., are needed in any respect ranges of human existence (particular person, supra-individual, international). Their significance lies in making certain the soundness and safety of human existence, preserving the integrity of the world in all its variety, thereby sustainable improvement” [7, p. 16]. Clarifying this idea, the creator writes: “a tradition of consent could be offered in two methods. It’s a method of organizing human co-existence to be able to guarantee security, survival, creation of life and sustainable improvement, in addition to a technique of private identification, due to which, in the midst of an individual’s unity with others, an individual’s consciousness and understanding of himself happens, with out which it’s unimaginable constructing a person “human world” and enriching it. Subsequently, the tradition of consent is constructive” [7, p. 18].
Thus, the tradition of consent primarily acts as a form ofsecond globally oriented schooling, which integrates these planetary (systemic) instructions and ranges of sociocultural communications wherein supraregional mechanisms for regulating fashionable worldwide processes of their integrity and variety come up and are strengthened.
This context seems to be essential from the standpoint of making certain the mastery of the content material of intercultural communications. “The dialogical method presupposes the chance to see one other tradition not as a world of objects, “cultural info,” ordered by the monologue considered a scientist, however as a world of “mutually illuminated consciousnesses, a world of related semantic attitudes,” that’s, to make it converse in lots of voices, “revive” [5, p. 54]. This, in precept, implies that “the dialogue of cultures, if we take its moral element, isn’t a lot a truth of right now as a venture attempting to understand one of many potentialities of human existence: to reside in peace with different cultures, with out compromising one’s personal, the implementation of which requires huge strong-willed, mental, social and political efforts” [5, p. 60]. On account of intercultural dialogue, the next stage of their interplay is shaped, which is a product of particular sociocultural replica. The latter represents the actual exercise and communication of cultural topics of people, teams, organizations, ethnic teams, nations within the sphere of intercultural dialogue. Right here a posh set of intercultural agreements and identifications is created – from the event of a standard platform – a place in relation to one another and to modernity – to personal agreements on cultural tourism, instructional packages, the group of exhibitions and displays, and scientific analysis.
Thus, private identification within the technique of intercultural communication is “a posh ideological and psychological phenomenon wherein the emotional and rational, psychological and ideological, many properties, qualities, traits of the person and neighborhood are built-in”; carried out “not solely correlation, identification of individuals with the corresponding neighborhood, but additionally concepts concerning the neighborhood itself: “the picture of us” consists of concepts about ourselves and others, in addition to the traits of a given group – tradition, language, territory, state, historical past.” An essential side of identification is “emotions shared by a bunch – ethnic (within the case of an ethnic neighborhood) or in direction of one’s nation, state, residents of the state, in addition to sure actions of individuals… The ideological element is integral to the construction of identification” [8, p. 203–204]. Mastering the potential of intercultural communication (dialogue) has many alternative areas: the formation and implementation of cultural and interethnic insurance policies, the event and implementation of revolutionary fashions of contemporary schooling, the event of worldwide cultural tourism, joint scientific analysis, and so on. Right here we will distinguish the worldwide, interregional and native ranges.
So, on the worldwide stage, intercultural dialogue makes it doable to type public opinion on a variety of essential problems with our time, to type numerous funds to help the cultures of third world international locations, to arrange worldwide congresses and festivals, and to actively cooperate with UNESCO and different organizations. UNESCO Chairs contribute to the promotion of peace and are a key hyperlink within the improvement of intercultural and interreligious dialogue amongst academia, researchers, policymakers and civil society.
An essential occasion within the lively promotion of interreligious and intercultural dialogue is I and II World Nomad Video games within the Kyrgyz Republic. In 2016, as a part of the cultural program on the II World Nomad Video games, a thousand Kyrgyz komuz gamers performed the composition “Mash Botoi” by Atay Ogonbaev for the primary time, and every nation demonstrated its traditions and customs [9].
On the interregional stage we’re speaking about cultural coverage throughout the nation (or between particular international locations), wherein the principle issues are the “cultural alignment” of ethnic teams and small nations, establishing cultural dialogue between city and rural tradition, the middle and periphery of the nation. For contemporary Kygyzstan, fixing the issue of discovering cultural and ideological symbols of the supranational and supra ethnic ranges is of nice significance. Certainly, for the non secular and ethical unity of the nation, it is extremely essential to search out such a which means and content material of the all-Kyrgyz cultural area that, from the angle of the entire, would categorical the distinctiveness and sociocultural identification of Kyrgyzstan. On this foundation, fashionable ideology and the nation’s worldwide mission could be clarified.
The necessity to implement and grasp intercultural dialogue requires rising the extent of schooling of its topics – instructing the tradition of dialogic communication because the preliminary capacity to reside in a civil democratic society. On the stage of interpersonal communication, dialogue is the supply and foundation for fixing a variety of instructional issues.
Conclusion
Thus, the principle targets of intercultural dialogue as a technique of instructional interpersonal interplay and a technique of studying would be the following:
Offering new data to communication companions to be able to bridge the information hole. However this requirement is related not just for lecturers and college students, but additionally for communication between enterprise entities, generations, administration and the general public. Data alternate is a method of influencing the “receiving” aspect, which builds new positions for all the administration system within the area.
Growing a standard understanding establishing a single semantic subject via the seek for private meanings and interpretation. In accordance with V.I. Karasik, dialogue isn’t restricted to the alternate of meanings, however entails “the institution of a standard semantic subject, an important parts of that are comparatively secure psychological formations obtained because of particular person interplay between an individual and the setting” [10, p. 61].
Updating the dialogical considering of scholars with the goal of improvement of their information and concepts based mostly on operations of study, comparability and generalization. On the premise of dialogue, private meanings, worth judgments and relationships are additionally developed, which is able to permit for a deeper revelation of the individuality of every of the topics collaborating within the dialogue.
For cultural interplay, in distinction to political, financial, organizational and others, is characterised by the truth that “the switch of knowledge between communicants is carried out in opposition to a sure emotional background and is accompanied by the expression of 1’s personal place and evaluation in relation to what’s being expressed” [11, p. 46–47].
The concerns expressed right here concerning the traits of intercultural communications and their affect on fashionable processes at totally different ranges, after all, don’t exhaust this advanced matter and require continued analysis [12]. Nevertheless, the basic factors highlighted by the authors – the connection of intercultural communications with the method of contemporary globalization, the dialogue foundation of those communications, their capacity to specific goal system-wide traits – have methodological significance and ought to be taken under consideration in subsequent areas of study of this matter.
Bibliography
Shipunova A. D.Communication technique is the code of social order // Communication methods of the knowledge society. Proceedings of the III Worldwide Scientific and Theoretical Convention. – St. Petersburg. : Publishing Home of the Polytechnic College, 2010.
Gavra D.P.Fundamentals of communication concept. – St. Petersburg. : Publishing home “Peter”, 2011. – P. 53.
Korshunov A. M., Mantatov V.V. The idea of reflection and the heuristic position of indicators. – M.: Publishing home Moskov. College, 1974. – 214 p.
Bibler V. S. From “notes for future use” // Questions of Philosophy. – 1991. –
No. 6. – pp. 15–45.
Ornatskaya L. A.Intercultural dialogue: issues and prospects for analysis // Bulletin of St. Petersburg College. Culturology. Collection 6. Vol. 1. – St. Petersburg, 2014. – pp. 48–61.
Pletnev D. I.Civil tradition as a tradition of concord between society and the state: dis. …cand. Thinker Sci. – Tomsk, 2005. – 137 p.
Menyaeva M. P.Tradition of consent: essence, formation, replica: summary. dis. … Physician of Philosophy Sci. – Chelyabinsk, 2015.
Leskova I. V.Sociocultural identification: theoretical and utilized elements // Social politics and sociology. – M., 2007. – No. 3.
Brusilovsky D. A.Potentialities of Islam within the context of intra-religious, inter-religious and intercultural dialogue within the fashionable period // Society: philosophy, historical past, tradition. Vol. 10. – Krasnodar, 2016.
Karasik V. I.Ethnic-specific ideas // Z. D. Popova et al. Introduction to cognitivelinguistics: textbook. allowance/reply. ed. M. V. Pimenova. – Kemerovo: Kuzbasvuzizdat, 2005. – P. 61–105.
Agapova S. G.Fundamentals of interpersonal and intercultural communication (English) / Collection “Greater Schooling”. – Rostov n/a. : Phoenix, 2004. – 288 p.
The position of spirituality within the improvement of society / Raikan Ysmailova, et.al. // E3S Internet Conf., 210 (2020) 17035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021017035